Nigella Ostentatious But No Common Sense

The court case was lost. Unsurprisingly really. The jury took a common-sense view of the relationship between personal assistants and their pay masters. So the facts are that two sisters were employed by Nigella Lawson and her, can I say it in jest, ex-husband (not sure about the divorce situation but it would seem to be in process), as personal assistants.

They were given carte blanche ability to use credit cards and in any expense agreements, all had been signed off by their paymasters. Unfortunately for Lawson/Saatchi, this involved significant spending on other items. So the jury said, that they should have been wary, and undertaken a professional approach, which would have prevented most of this excess. But they did not. So now the case was lost, the bickering continues, the sisters should be unemployable, with their reputations known publicly as well as their names, and life goes on as normal. Whether the protagonists will learn from this lesson is debatable, but people do what people can, whether legally or in some cases not. The lack of a common-sense approach is indicative and therefore, "it serves them right" is an appropriate statement. From most people there will be sympathy for anyone from this, but at least Nigella can get back to her ostentatious / sensual approach to food. Caveat emptor.

Here is something that adds to this whole debacle

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Google Maps and Spying

Is the United Kingdom Leaving the European Union - Two Years On

Why You Cannot Trust Football or Soccer to be Fair for Children - A Personal Perspective